Ridiculous Aspects of Evolution

Edward J. Larson, in his book, The Theory of Evolution: A History of Controversy, tells us that in 1859 when Darwin's Origin of the Species came out, though evidence was considerably lacking, many people jumped on board believing that it would be found. We need to understand that evolutionists have been looking for it ever since. Evolution is based on blind, irrational faith in Atheism. As many evolutionists have stated "I don't believe in evolutionism because it's the best scientific theory but because it's the only one which leaves out the Supernatural." (Why Scientists Accept Evolution). Evolutionists, typically do not believe that any such thing as absolute truth exists. Christianity is based on Truth and evolution on Atheist fantasy. Such books written in defense of Christianity such as Evidence That Demands a Verdict, are dismissed with one liners not rational refutation. John Grove, is a man with no background and obviously lacking an education, some sort of technical training, perhaps, but no real education, had this to say about my arguments: "Let's look at your arguments:1. Please take a course in logic (red herring) 2. Learn how thinking is done (red herring)". What Grove is asserting is that neither Logic nor clear thinking has anything relevance to discussing evolution. This I certainly believe because I have never seen a logical argument for evolution. I have seen numerous ones based on logical fallacies such as Insufficient Evidence, one tooth or four fragments of bone from which evolutionist "experts" can deduce an entire skeleton, whether it was six foot four or four foot six, what it looked like on the outside, including hair and what it had for breakfast! Quite an amazing performance! As Aristotle said "One Swallow does not make a Summer." One tooth does not make a primitive man! However I have a challenge. Hey Grove! Let us extract one of your teeth. We'll turn it over to one of your Experts and see if he can reconstruct your skeleton, what you look like on the outside and what you have for breakfast! Sounds fair to me. How about it?

Grove goes on: "3. Also get a great big dose of intellectual honesty (red herring, rant) " This of course is unjustified on my part just because evolutionists have told lie after lie after lie. Nebraska Man And Piltdown Man were complete frauds, both doctored evidence and Insufficient Evidence. Political Fascist Ernst Haekel, instrumental in laying down the foundations of Nazi Germany, produced fraudulent drawings of the human embryo, used right down to the present day to huckster evolution to young people. Grove continues: "4. I am a teacher (red herring). I am a scientist, so what? Do you teach high school, college or a University? I have taught classes at many Universities. (this is irrelevant, Grove's teaching career is not under discussion here. Maybe instead of a teacher he's a purple penguin.).

5. If a student turned in a paper like your ravings, he would get an "F" (red herring, off topic)

6. He would also be told that he didn't know what he was talking about (Red herring, off topic, rant)" What Grove doesn't understand is that teaching is about standards. If a student doesn't correctly do an Arithmetic paper, he will be marked down for it. That is why we have grading. I have taught at schools where it was understood that there were right answers and wrong answers to questions, mainly because there is such a thing as truth. Whatever institutions Grove has taught in, apparently have no such standards. Post Modernist teachers are of the same persuasion as Grove. A question they cannot answer is "If there is no truth, what have you to teach that is worth learning?" But this is what I find so funny about Secular Humanism, There is no absolute truth but there are things that approximate it or approach it. There are no Booglegums but things that resemble them, do tell! It doesn't exist but there are things that resemble what doesn't exist. The real kicker is that there is no truth so that leaves them free to tell everybody, who's who, what's what and where everybody, except them, should get off! Interesting!

Grove continues: "7. how would you like to own a famous American landmark (Red herring, rant) 8. I think I could put you in touch with a fellow who would be glad to sell one to you for a fraction of it's appraised value (red herring, off topic)" Being intellectually challenged, Grove doesn't understand that if you believe in non-logical logic and that that there is no truth, you should be gullible enough to buy the Brooklyn Bridge. Oh! Well that's what he has done or it's equivalent!

Jeremy D. Pike, no background, no identity, no qualifications, he just pops up, says:
"I completely agree -- most Americans hold the belief that (at least) all men are created equal. But since this is a belief asserted on axiomatic grounds without scientific foundations, we know it is simply untrue; on the basis that it is not scientific" Most people assert this on the basis of Theistic belief. "We hold the truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal..." But what we should say is that Chemistry 101 proved, verified(?) that all men are created equal. In the real world, scientific ideas are verifiable not provable and pertain to things observable, repeatable and testable. Some of the best accredited Philosophers of science hold that scientific ideas are not true but merely useful!

One of the most ridiculous aspects of evolutionist's so called thinking is their denial of absolute Truth. This is what has made their ideas so popular with tyrants and oppressors. But to deny absolute truth is to assert an absolute truth which is also unprovable. The anti-metaphysical bias of evolutionist True Believers is another monumental irrationality. To deny that metaphysics has any relevance is to make a metaphysical assertion. Metaphysics concerns what you believe about the nature of God, Man and the Universe. Such opinions are inescapable and evolutionists have not escaped them, they hold a bunch of them unconsciously. The mark of an educated person is to know what you are doing when you are doing it. Evolutionists think they are doing science when they are really doing religion. Fanatical, irrational self-contradictory religion. They have more myths than the ancient Greeks.

Unlike most other religions, evolutionists deeply resent being called what their religion says they are. According to their religion, they, all people, are apes. Darwin referred to our "Simian ancestors", Simia is the Latin word for ape. Look up the word "primate", "human beings, Gorillas and Chimpanzees", apes! So why don't they go ape over being apes!